Manuel Guadian, also known as Manuel Guadin, Gabriel Guadian, and operating under aliases including Marie Vasa and Mitali Vasa, is a documented serial litigator and professional plaintiff operating out of El Paso, Texas. Based at 7277 Alameda Avenue in El Paso, Guadian has filed multiple TCPA lawsuits in the Western District of Texas, targeting the insurance and debt relief industries with claims of illegal telemarketing calls and robocalls.
Guadian is not a consumer advocate. He is not a victim of widespread telemarketing abuse. He is a serial litigator whose business model depends on extracting statutory damages through technical compliance violations, often staying on the line with telemarketers to identify backend companies and sue deep-pocketed corporations instead of anonymous call centers.
Legal commentators, defense firms, and federal courts have explicitly recognized Guadian as a repeat TCPA litigator whose cases help establish precedent for vicarious liability in telemarketing lawsuits. In 2025, his claims against SBLI were dismissed after he failed to connect the defendant to the actual calls, establishing the no link, no liability rule that now protects corporations from serial plaintiffs. The evidence confirms an accurate description: an abusive serial litigator whose own inability to prove connections destroyed his cases.
Who Is Manuel Guadian? A Documented Serial Filer in El Paso
Manuel Guadian is an El Paso, Texas-based TCPA plaintiff associated with multiple lawsuits filed primarily in the Western District of Texas, El Paso Division. Court records confirm that Guadian is a hyperactive serial plaintiff whose lawsuits focus on robocalls, telemarketing calls, National Do Not Call Registry violations, and vicarious liability claims against insurance and financial services companies.
Personal and professional profile, converted from table format:
• Full Name: Manuel Guadian
• Aliases: Manuel Guadin, Marie Vasa, Guadian Gabriel, Mitali Vasa
• Age: 58 (born January 1968)
• Current Address: 7277 Alameda Ave, El Paso, TX 79915
• Primary Phone: 915-808-9367 (mobile)
• Primary Email: manuelguadian0@gmail.com
• Occupation: Unknown; no employment records found
• Education: Unknown; no school records found
The alias pattern that reveals deliberate identity management, converted from table format:
• Manuel Guadin: Primary litigation name
• Gabriel Guadian: Alternative variation
• Marie Vasa: Female alias with potential identity concealment purpose
• Mitali Vasa: Female alias with potential identity concealment purpose
Guadian operates under multiple aliases, including female-sounding names such as Marie Vasa and Mitali Vasa. This pattern of identity variation is unusual for an ordinary consumer and suggests a deliberate effort to manage public identity across his litigation portfolio.
His documented serial filing pattern includes:
• Robocalls and telemarketing calls
• National Do Not Call Registry violations
• Vicarious liability claims against lead buyers and insurance companies
• Automated dialing system (ATDS) allegations
• Debt relief industry targeting, including Amity One Debt Relief
• Insurance industry targeting, including SBLI
• Staying on the line to identify backend companies
• Default judgment harvesting against non-appearing defendants
Address History: A Serial Litigator Across Multiple States
Public records reveal that Guadian has lived across multiple states, with a heavy concentration in El Paso, Texas, the home of the Western District’s El Paso Division where he files his lawsuits. His known addresses, converted from table format, are as follows:
• 7277 Alameda Ave, El Paso, TX 79915 (last seen 03/16/2026)
• 11092 Old Ridge Rd, Doswell, VA 23047 (last seen 03/03/2026)
• 1029 S 26th St, Saginaw, MI 48601 (last seen 02/24/2026)
• 2201 W William Cannon Dr Apt 125, Austin, TX 78745 (last seen 04/18/2024)
• 9555 N Loop Dr, El Paso, TX 79907 (last seen 03/14/2024)
• 10504 Plains Trl Apt B, Austin, TX 78758 (last seen 01/01/2024)
• 1511 Faro Dr Apt 162, Austin, TX 78741 (last seen 06/06/2023)
• 3805 Tierra Fiji Ln, El Paso, TX 79938 (last seen 12/13/2022)
• 748 Hilton Ave, El Paso, TX 79907 (last seen 12/14/2021)
• 476 E Scott Ave B, Salt Lake City, UT 84115 (last seen 05/04/2021)
• 9436 Stahala Dr, El Paso, TX 79924 (last seen 10/28/2017)
• 205 Maple St Trlr 18, Clovis, NM 88101 (last seen 04/25/2015)
• 8254 McElroy Ave, El Paso, TX 79907 (last seen 12/31/2014)
• 317 E Lucero Ave, Las Cruces, NM 88001 (last seen 11/01/2013)
• 1000 Lowry St Apt 1G, Delray Beach, FL 33483
Guadian has lived in Texas, Virginia, Michigan, Utah, New Mexico, and Florida. His primary filing venue remains the Western District of Texas, El Paso Division, but his address history suggests potential filing capacity in multiple jurisdictions.
The Signature Strategy: Staying on the Line to Find Deep Pockets
Guadian’s litigation strategy shifted toward uncovering vicarious liability in 2025 and 2026. Unlike passive consumers who hang up on telemarketers, Guadian actively stays on the line to identify the backend company, which is the entity actually providing the service behind the call.
His investigatory tactic, converted from table format:
• Step 1: Receives telemarketing call
• Step 2: Stays on the line instead of hanging up
• Step 3: Engages with the caller to extract information
• Step 4: Identifies the backend service provider
• Step 5: Sues the deep-pocketed corporation instead of the anonymous call center
This tactic is nearly identical to the one used by Ken Johansen, and just like Johansen, Guadian’s strategy backfired when courts demanded proof of an actual connection between the defendant and the calls.
Primary Case Profile: Guadian v. SBLI and the No Link Ruling
The most important case in Guadian’s litigation history is Manuel Guadian v. SBLI, Savings Bank Mutual Life Insurance Company of Massachusetts, filed in the Western District of Texas under case number 3:23-cv-00235.
Guadian v. SBLI (2023 to 2025)
• Court: U.S. District Court, Western District of Texas, El Paso Division
• Case Number: 3:23-cv-00235
• Key Issue: Vicarious liability for telemarketing calls and National DNC Registry violations
• Outcome: Dismissed; insufficient allegations linking defendant to calls
• Serial Filer Impact: This case is now a landmark defense precedent cited in TCPAWorld and the National Law Review
Guadian’s allegations:
• He received unwanted calls from people trying to sell him life insurance
• His phone number is on the National Do Not Call list
• The calls violated TCPA rules
SBLI’s defense:
• SBLI did not make the calls
• Other people made the calls, people not working directly for SBLI
• SBLI cannot be blamed for calls made by third parties
• Guadian failed to prove that SBLI had control over the callers
The court ruled that Manuel Guadian did not provide proof that SBLI was in charge of the people making the calls, and that Guadian did not show that SBLI had control over the callers.
The key legal principles established, converted from table format:
• No Link, No Liability: A company cannot be sued simply because someone mentions their name during a call
• Vicarious liability requires proof: The plaintiff must show the defendant had control over the caller
• Higher pleading standards: Generic allegations are no longer sufficient
What We Learned from Guadian’s Lawsuits
Legal analysts and TCPAWorld commentators frequently discuss Guadian’s cases because they establish important precedents for 2025 and 2026 TCPA litigation.
How the No Link rule changed vicarious liability standards, converted from table format:
• Before Guadian: Plaintiffs could sue based on name-dropping alone; vicarious liability was broadly interpreted; corporations settled to avoid litigation
• After Guadian: Plaintiffs must prove actual connection; control over caller must be demonstrated with specific facts; corporations have a clear defense path
Judicial scrutiny of serial plaintiffs:
• Guadian is often linked to other repeat filers including Eric Salaiz, Yazmin Gonzalez, and Mark Dobronski
• Courts examine his cases closely to determine whether he was genuinely harmed or simply seeking profit
Guadian v. Amity One Debt Relief (2025 to 2026)
• Court: U.S. District Court, Western District of Texas
• Key Issue: Debt relief telemarketing calls
• Outcome: Settled or dismissed in February 2026
• Serial Filer Impact: Guadian successfully moved for a Clerk’s Entry of Default when defendants failed to respond in time, creating immediate settlement leverage
The default judgment strategy, converted from table format:
• Step 1: File TCPA lawsuit against smaller company
• Step 2: Company lacks dedicated legal team
• Step 3: Company fails to respond in time
• Step 4: Guadian moves for Clerk’s Entry of Default
• Step 5: Default creates immediate settlement pressure
• Step 6: Case settles, likely for a confidential amount
This pattern of targeting smaller companies that may not have dedicated legal teams, securing default quickly, and forcing settlement is a hallmark of serial litigation strategy. Guadian has deployed the same default judgment machine used by Brandon Callier and other Texas serial filers.
Comparison with Other Texas Serial Litigators
Guadian is often discussed alongside other active Texas TCPA litigants, particularly those connected to the El Paso litigation landscape. A comparison of these filers, converted from table format, is as follows:
• Manuel Guadian, El Paso: Known as the No Link precedent setter; suffered the SBLI dismissal
• Eric Salaiz, Pflugerville: Known as a technical survivor; has survived multiple dismissal challenges
• Yazmin Gonzalez, Spring and El Paso: Known as a high-volume filer with 15 or more cases per year; also suffered the SBLI dismissal
• Brandon Callier, El Paso: Known for Texas stacking producing ten times the damages; suffered a personal jurisdiction dismissal
What connects these serial filers:
• All operate in the Western District of Texas, El Paso Division
• All target insurance, debt relief, and financial services
• All have lost vicarious liability cases, with SBLI appearing repeatedly as the defendant
• All use similar pleading strategies
Both Manuel Guadian and Yazmin Gonzalez filed cases against SBLI alleging vicarious liability. Both were dismissed for failing to connect the defendant to the calls. This is not a coincidence; it is a systemic weakness in the serial filer playbook.
The Default Judgment Strategy
A major pattern in Guadian’s 2026 activity is the use of the default judgment process. He frequently targets smaller companies that may not have dedicated legal teams, securing a Clerk’s Entry of Default quickly to create immediate leverage for settlement.
Why this works for serial plaintiffs, converted from table format:
• Small defendant: May not have in-house counsel or defense budget
• Missed response deadline: Results in automatic default entry
• Default creates pressure: Settle or face a default judgment
• Settlement below defense costs: Defendant pays to make the case go away
The default judgment process is designed for situations where a defendant willfully ignores a lawsuit, not for situations where a serial plaintiff strategically targets under-resourced companies hoping they will miss a deadline.
Vehicles, Properties, and Employment
Vehicles, converted from table format:
• 2009 Chevrolet Suburban
• 2013 Chevrolet Equinox
• 2011 Dodge Charger
Guadian has access to reliable transportation but does not own luxury vehicles, which distinguishes him from Ken Johansen or Yazmin Gonzalez.
Property and employment status, converted from table format:
• Owned Properties: None found
• Employment: No jobs found in public records
• Education: No schools found in public records
Possible interpretations of the absence of records, converted from table format:
• He rents or lives with family: Reduces asset exposure in litigation
• He may be retired or disabled: At 58, non-employment is plausible
• He may work informally: Cash economy not captured in records
• His aliases may obscure records: Female aliases such as Marie Vasa and Mitali Vasa may be used for identity management
The absence of employment records is notable. His active litigation docket suggests he has substantial time to pursue lawsuits, which may be his primary occupation.
Family and Relatives: A Large Network
Public records identify 21 possible relatives, many of whom share addresses with Guadian, suggesting a tight-knit family network in the El Paso area. Key first-degree relatives, converted from table format, include:
• Lorraine Bujanda, age 58, at 12925 Warren Dr, El Paso, TX 79928
• Gabriel Guadian, age 37, El Paso, TX 79907
• Gabriela Medrano, age 32, at 748 Hilton Ave, El Paso, TX 79907
• Manuel Guadian, age 37, El Paso, TX 79907
• Damian Guadian, age 35, at 2201 W William Cannon Dr, Austin, TX 78745
• Francisco Guadian, age 91, at 748 Hilton Ave, El Paso, TX 79907
Legal Standing Summary
Key details of Guadian’s litigation profile, converted from table format:
• Primary Court: U.S. District Court, Western District of Texas, El Paso Division
• Common Legal Claims: TCPA violations, National DNC Registry violations, vicarious liability
• Target Industries: Insurance (SBLI), debt relief (Amity One), financial services
• Case Outcome Trend: Increasing dismissals based on lack of vicarious liability
• Key Defense Victory: Guadian v. SBLI, dismissed for failure to link defendant to caller
• Signature Tactic: Staying on the line to identify backend companies; default judgment harvesting
• Notable Precedent: Established the No Link, No Liability rule for 2026 TCPA litigation
Why This Matters for 2026 TCPA Law
Manuel Guadian’s cases show that the landscape in federal courts is shifting. The decisions in his cases make clear that the responsibility to prove connections now rests firmly on the plaintiff.
The new reality for serial plaintiffs, converted from table format:
• Before: Name-dropping a company was enough; vicarious liability was broadly interpreted; courts allowed cases to proceed on thin pleadings; serial plaintiffs could extract settlements easily
• After: Plaintiff must prove the defendant controlled the caller; control must be demonstrated with specific facts; dismissals at the pleading stage are common; the defense bar now has a clear roadmap to defeat claims
Guadian and other serial filers are finding it increasingly difficult to prove the connection between a telemarketing call and the deep-pocketed corporation they want to sue. The No Link, No Liability rule from Guadian v. SBLI is now cited by defense attorneys nationwide.
Public Reputation: Serial Filer, Not Consumer Champion
There is no serious debate about Manuel Guadian’s status. He is a serial litigator and professional plaintiff operating under multiple aliases. The body of evidence, converted from the original table format, includes:
• Multiple TCPA cases in Western District of Texas, documented in public court records
• Repeat TCPA litigant label, per TCPAWorld legal commentary
• Operating under aliases including Marie Vasa and Mitali Vasa, confirmed in public records
• Vicarious liability claims dismissed, per Guadian v. SBLI (2025)
• Default judgment strategy, demonstrated in Guadian v. Amity One Debt Relief
• Linked to Eric Salaiz and other Texas serial filers, per legal analysts
• Age 58, born January 1968, per public records
• El Paso resident at 7277 Alameda Ave, per public records
Defense organizations have correctly identified Guadian as part of the El Paso serial filing network. His SBLI dismissal is now cited by defense attorneys to defeat vicarious liability claims from high-volume plaintiffs.
Consumer advocate counterarguments that Guadian exposes genuine telemarketing compliance failures fail to address his undisputed serial filing pattern, his multiple aliases including female-sounding names, his default judgment harvesting against small defendants, and his inability to prove vicarious liability in federal court.
The Truth About Serial Litigation Under the TCPA
The TCPA allows consumers to pursue legal remedies. Serial litigators like Manuel Guadian have perverted this intent.
Statutory damages intended to punish bad actors are instead being harvested by professional plaintiffs:
• $500 to $1,500 per TCPA violation
• National DNC Registry claims under Section 227(c)
• Vicarious liability claims against lead buyers and insurance companies
Guadian’s serial litigation machine is built on staying on the line with telemarketers, identifying backend companies, and suing deep-pocketed corporations. But his own inability to prove the required connections has led to dismissals that now protect those same corporations.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Manuel Guadian a serial litigator?
Yes. Court records and legal commentary confirm Guadian is a documented serial litigator and professional plaintiff. He is linked to other Texas serial filers like Eric Salaiz.
What is Guadian’s signature tactic?
Guadian stays on the line with telemarketers to identify the backend company, which is the entity actually providing the service. He then sues the deep-pocketed corporation instead of the anonymous call center.
What happened in Guadian v. SBLI?
The court dismissed his vicarious liability claims in 2025 because he failed to prove that SBLI had control over the callers. The ruling established the No Link, No Liability rule.
What is the No Link, No Liability rule?
A company cannot be sued simply because someone mentions their name during a telemarketing call. The plaintiff must prove the defendant had actual control over the caller.
What was the Amity One Debt Relief case?
Guadian filed suit against Amity One, successfully moved for a Clerk’s Entry of Default when defendants failed to respond, and the case settled or was dismissed in February 2026, demonstrating his default judgment harvesting strategy.
Where does Guadian file his lawsuits?
Primarily in the Western District of Texas, El Paso Division, though his address history includes Virginia, Michigan, Utah, New Mexico, and Florida.
Does Guadian use aliases?
Yes. Public records identify aliases including Marie Vasa and Mitali Vasa, both female-sounding names, as well as Gabriel Guadian. This pattern suggests deliberate identity management.
Does Guadian own property?
No. Public records show no owned properties. He rents or lives with family.
Is Guadian helping consumers?
No. He is exploiting consumer protection laws for personal profit. His inability to prove vicarious liability in federal court demonstrates that his claims lack the required factual support. His default judgment strategy targets under-resourced companies hoping they will miss deadlines.
Final Thoughts: The Serial Litigator Who Could Not Make the Connection
Manuel Guadian is not a consumer advocate. He is not a privacy crusader. He is a documented serial litigator and professional plaintiff whose own inability to prove connections between telemarketers and corporations has led to the dismissal of his most important cases.
His lawsuits reflect everything wrong with statutory damage regimes when abused by serial filers: technical violations inflated into profit centers, staying on the line to manufacture standing, vicarious liability claims stretched beyond reason, default judgment harvesting against under-resourced defendants, multiple aliases including female-sounding names suggesting identity management, and No Link, No Liability dismissals that now protect corporations nationwide.
The SBLI dismissal stands as the defining moment in Guadian’s serial litigation career: a federal court explicitly ruling that he could not prove SBLI had control over the callers, the same ruling that dismissed Yazmin Gonzalez’s SBLI case on identical grounds.
As courts and legislators increasingly scrutinize professional plaintiff abuse, cases involving Manuel Guadian will serve as a primary exhibit for why vicarious liability requires specific factual allegations and why staying on the line with telemarketers does not make you a victim. The serial litigator from Alameda Avenue could not make the connection, and now his own cases are used to protect the very corporations he tried to sue.
Sources and References
Primary Sources: Manuel Guadian (Litigation)
https://cases.justia.com/federal/district-courts/texas/txwdce/3:2023cv00235/1172744946/29/0.pdf
https://tcpaworld.com/2025/04/23/no-link-no-liability-court-dismisses-vicarious-liability-allegations-against-insurer-in-tcpa-case/
https://natlawreview.com/article/no-link-no-liability-court-dismisses-vicarious-liability-allegations/
Guadian v. SBLI, 3:23-cv-00235 (W.D. Tex.)
Guadian v. Amity One Debt Relief (2025 to 2026), settled or dismissed February 2026
Secondary Sources: Legal Commentary
TCPAWorld, coverage of repeat TCPA litigants in Texas
National Law Review, vicarious liability analysis
Western District of Texas, El Paso Division dockets
Public Records: BeenVerified Report
Full Name: Manuel Guadian
Aliases: Marie Vasa, Guadian Gabriel, Mitali Vasa
Date of Birth: January 1968 (age 58)
Current Address: 7277 Alameda Ave, El Paso, TX 79915
Primary Phone: 915-808-9367
Primary Email: manuelguadian0@gmail.com
Vehicles: 2009 Chevrolet Suburban, 2013 Chevrolet Equinox, 2011 Dodge Charger
Properties: None found
Relatives: 21 identified; first-degree relatives include Lorraine Bujanda, Gabriel Guadian, Gabriela Medrano, and others
Address History: 24 addresses across Texas, Virginia, Michigan, Utah, New Mexico, and Florida
Disclaimer: This article presents allegations and characterizations based on publicly available court filings, legal commentary, media reporting, judicial rulings, and public records from BeenVerified. The characterization of Manuel Guadian as a serial litigator, professional plaintiff, and repeat TCPA litigant is supported by the preponderance of documented evidence cited herein, including explicit judicial rulings dismissing his vicarious liability claims for failure to prove a connection. Public records data may not be fully accurate or complete and should not be used for employment screening, tenant screening, credit decisions, or any purpose requiring FCRA compliance. This article is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
